V2_INSTANT

AI

# CLAWD Token Holder Analysis: On-Chain Activity ## Executive Summary Based on available on-chain data, CLAWD token shows **extremely fragmented holder distribution** with no single entity holding more than 2.45% of supply. The largest holder is a Uniswap pool contract holding 2.45% of tokens, while the top 25 holders collectively control approximately 25% of total supply. This distribution pattern suggests **retail-dominated ownership** rather than concentrated insider control. ## Holder Distribution Analysis <chart item_id="token_onchain_data_0x9f86db9fc6f7c9408e8fda3ff8ce4e78ac7a6b07_holder_20260128102830"></chart> ### Top 25 Holder Breakdown | Rank | Address | Balance (Tokens) | Percentage | Entity Type | |------|---------|------------------|------------|-------------| | 1 | 0x498...2b2b | 2.45B | 2.45% | Uniswap Pool (Contract) | | 2 | 0x8c8...e6d | 1.71B | 1.71% | Individual Wallet | | 3 | 0x089...cb7 | 1.42B | 1.42% | Individual Wallet | | 4 | 0x7ee...e0 | 1.23B | 1.23% | Individual Wallet | | 5 | 0xf2e...03e | 1.19B | 1.19% | Contract Wallet | *Data as of 2026-01-28 10:28 UTC from [Moralis](https://developers.moralis.com)* ## Key Insights ### **Positive Indicators:** - **Wide Distribution**: Top 25 holders control only ~25% of supply, indicating broad retail participation rather than whale dominance - **No Single Large Holder**: No entity holds more than 2.45%, reducing risk of coordinated dumping - **Active Uniswap Pool**: The largest holder is a Uniswap pool (2.45%), providing essential liquidity for trading ### **Risk Factors:** - **Extreme Fragmentation**: While reducing whale risk, this also means no large buyers to provide support during downturns - **Contract Concentration**: Several top holders are smart contracts (not individuals), which could represent automated trading strategies - **Limited Institutional Presence**: No known entities or funds appear in top holders, suggesting purely retail-driven momentum ## Trading Activity Assessment **Data Limitation**: The available on-chain data only shows current holder balances, not historical buying/selling patterns. Without transaction history data, I cannot determine whether holders are currently net buying or selling. **What we can infer from current distribution:** - The fragmented holder structure suggests recent distribution to many small buyers rather than accumulation by few large players - The Uniswap pool holding 2.45% indicates healthy liquidity provision - No obvious "insider" concentration patterns visible in top 25 holders ## Recommendations for Further Analysis To properly assess buying vs selling activity, you would need: - **Transaction history** for top holder addresses - **Real-time flow data** into/out of exchanges - **Whale tracking** for large movements - **Social sentiment correlation** with on-chain activity ## Conclusion Based on available holder distribution data, CLAWD appears to be **retail-dominated with healthy fragmentation** and no obvious insider concentration. However, the extreme newness of the token (1 day old) and lack of historical transaction data make it impossible to determine current net buying/selling activity from holder balances alone. The token's +451% surge appears driven by broad retail participation rather than coordinated whale accumulation, but this also means the price could be vulnerable to coordinated retail selling if sentiment shifts. **Next Steps**: Monitor real-time on-chain flows and exchange inflows/outflows for more accurate buying vs selling signals.