Holder analysis for token 28a2oQVCPrJB7SLZo4DVMVdHchSXiG8sZy31DohPpump

## TL;DR This Solana token (address: `28a2oQVCPrJB7SLZo4DVMVdHchSXiG8sZy31DohPpump`) shows moderate holder concentration, with the top 10 holders controlling approximately 39.8% of the total supply of 999,996,446 tokens. Notable entities include pump.fun (a meme token platform) and Jupiter (a DEX aggregator) among the top holders, suggesting platform-related liquidity or early involvement. The rest appear to be unlabeled wallets, which is common for newer or smaller tokens—this distribution points to potential centralization risk but also active early accumulation. ## Core Analysis ### Holder Distribution Overview The token's holder base is skewed toward a few large wallets, which is typical for Solana meme tokens launched on platforms like pump.fun. With a total supply of **999,996,446.071644** tokens, the top 25 holders account for a significant portion, but exact figures beyond the top 10 aren't fully detailed here. The top 10 alone hold nearly 40% of supply, raising flags for whale influence on price movements. No single holder dominates beyond 10%, which provides some balance, but the concentration could amplify volatility if these wallets move. Key metrics: - **Top 1 holder share**: 10.00% (100,000,000 tokens) - **Top 10 concentration**: ~39.8% of total supply - **USD valuation of top holder**: ~$268,606 (implying a token price around $0.0027 at the time of data snapshot) - Unlabeled wallets dominate (most top holders have no Arkham labels), indicating retail or anonymous accumulation rather than institutional involvement. This setup matters because high concentration can lead to dumps if early holders exit, but it also signals strong initial interest—watch for any outflows from these addresses to gauge sentiment. ### Top Holders Breakdown Here's the detailed list of the top 25 holders from on-chain data (Solana mainnet). Balances are in tokens, with percentages of total supply and approximate USD values at the snapshot time. | Rank | Address | Balance | Percentage | USD Value | |------|---------|---------|------------|-----------| | 1 | BBtTnj3AazcG4izo8ZcG3UxdEaDdzcfUvAjeVp3BbEF5 | 100000000 | 10.00% | $268605.9 | | 2 | Bj4zfmjW3yJxeirwWYTp6rRzHJ3R5hA9vt1H3W6e9Edh | 79785000 | 7.98% | $214307.217315 | | 3 | DKVwkn7UuyAUsoggwZVaCYXWc8tjVfMjGFjRKah144Br | 50000000 | 5.00% | $134302.95 | | 4 | 3XjGL7Fs4HBK1qHRFo46n7ex98vkGmK6vUXk9RkVS56A | 44905000 | 4.49% | $120617.479395 | | 5 | 91FPaXonom2yWwK6t4AWxKJ8gexh6AV6tLji41HFt8FB | 35664815.401498 | 3.57% | $95797.798392532316382 | | 6 | DzWwxsQLyoerGs16hQJyGWbhD4kC1iV3B6iKtREvw5SC | 21441143.836778 | 2.14% | $57592.177373072077902 | | 7 | 6CWCdyhFD4zn8uosL21hKM7FPhzo6z21QqZpvmUxQ5bw | 16325000.590541 | 1.63% | $43849.914761227967919 | | 8 | 3kxsKMakNHLD7T7RyPNGZMFjFLDQmNR5rFdVqf5QCMP3 | 13458469.009385 | 1.35% | $36150.241808879663715 | | 9 | E6cNKGWjhcLj8oCR2rBKi8JiD7CxWBGCM3dHWJ3PB9YB | 13305597.461993 | 1.33% | $35739.619813163455587 | | 10 | CNGimYxQngtgSxHCx4m7WF2JU4zcENgDGtgF1VLipxqK | 12850677.634043 | 1.29% | $34517.678315019906537 | | 11 | 5QpbP2DL7NV4Twgrj2rvYsEFV6w2xjwVguSDLoRhwaaz | 11311814.607436 | 1.13% | $30384.201432634934724 | | 12 | 4FkJyWNMXZgiJdXbtCwx8b5fBEzsSNcR7UQD3PFSve6g | 11019648.946988 | 1.10% | $29599.427230897640292 | | 13 | 83oFqqiFxQVwZVVzFLWKAR8ANUgSC7oToGFeJaHkWpmj | 10536453.766809 | 1.05% | $28301.536468421215731 | | 14 | 9wiuJ4yabQToFDDPjCULKx4jCGTK1bLLu5f5VeqHQKKa | 10286827 | 1.03% | $27631.024244793 | | 15 | 46ewg2ZZEw5cy5HTsiEvWZVnGPaaH8Y9spm36WjUS3HR | 10270419.867254 | 1.03% | $27586.953718216411986 | | 16 | BWZNcXnE4u3XVNWPnpZXsKHzAVqWMqpofNmTNu9cKXSB | 10088933.09441 | 1.01% | $27099.46953863783019 | | 17 | 2GCzfZ4TttcEAujTiZTnLnDAmvRzPvcmyxLqbc6tHDSS | 10031596.472616 | 1.00% | $26945.459989638... | (Data for ranks 18-25 is partially available but truncated; full details would require deeper on-chain querying. Percentages and USD values are calculated from total supply at snapshot.) ### Labeled Holders and Entity Insights Most top holders are unlabeled in public intelligence databases, suggesting they could be individual traders, bots, or early liquidity providers. However, two stand out with clear associations: - **Rank 5 (3.57%)**: Linked to **pump.fun**, a popular Solana meme token launchpad. This holding likely represents platform reserves, bonding curve liquidity, or creator allocations—common for tokens minted there, which could stabilize early trading but also tie the token's fate to pump.fun's ecosystem. - **Rank 6 (2.14%)**: Associated with **Jupiter**, a leading DEX aggregator on Solana. This might indicate routing or liquidity provision through Jupiter's pools, pointing to integrated trading activity rather than pure speculation. The lack of labels on the other 90%+ of top holdings means limited visibility into ownership—typical for pseudonymous chains like Solana. No major exchanges, funds, or known whales are flagged, reducing immediate centralization risks from big players but increasing uncertainty. ## On-Chain Analysis Holder data reveals a classic meme token profile: heavy early concentration that could dilute over time as more users enter. The top holder's 10% stake is sizable but not controlling, and the USD values (totaling over $1.5M for top 10) suggest decent liquidity at current levels. Without transaction history here, we can't confirm recent inflows/outflows, but the presence of platform entities like pump.fun implies this token originated from a fair launch mechanism—watch for any unlocks or migrations that could shift distribution. | Metric | Value | Timeframe | Signal | |--------|-------|-----------|--------| | Total Supply | 999,996,446.071644 tokens | Current | Fixed supply, no ongoing minting evident | | Top 10 Concentration | ~39.8% | Snapshot | Moderate centralization risk; whale dumps possible | | Labeled Entities | 2 (pump.fun, Jupiter) | Current | Platform involvement; potential for organic liquidity | | Unlabeled Wallets | 23/25 top holders | Current | High anonymity; retail-driven? | ## Conclusions **Bottom line**: This token's holders are concentrated in a handful of wallets with ties to Solana's meme and DEX ecosystem, making it vulnerable to coordinated moves but also positioned for viral growth if community expands. The 40% top-10 control is a yellow flag for volatility—ideal for short-term traders but riskier for long holds. Key risk: Unlabeled whales exiting; opportunity: If pump.fun/Jupiter integrations drive volume, distribution could broaden. Monitor these top addresses for transfers to spot shifts early.

## TL;DR Limited transaction data is available for the top holders of token `28a2oQVCPrJB7SLZo4DVMVdHchSXiG8sZy31DohPpump`, so I can't provide a full count of sellers, new entrants, or long-term holders. From the partial on-chain snapshots, no clear selling activity is evident in the visible records (mostly small, unrelated SOL transfers from 21+ days ago), and most top addresses appear static without recent token-specific movements. This suggests a majority may be holding steadily, but deeper history is needed to confirm durations or sales—treat this as preliminary with low confidence on activity levels. ## What I Can Answer Confidently Here's what the data shows about holder activity based on available Solscan snapshots: - **No confirmed selling in top holders**: Across the fetched account pages for ranks 1-6, there are no records of outbound transfers for this specific token. Visible transactions are minor SOL movements (e.g., 0.000005 SOL fees) from over 21 days ago, likely spam or unrelated. - **Holding patterns**: Top addresses like rank 4 (3XjGL7Fs4HBK1qHRFo46n7ex98vkGmK6vUXk9RkVS56A) show a stable token balance (e.g., ~44.9M units of an associated token, possibly this one), with no recent changes noted. Other ranks (1-3,5-6) have no transaction details extracted, implying inactivity or long-term holds in the snapshot period. - **New vs. established**: Without first-acquisition timestamps, I can't classify "new" (e.g., <30 days) vs. "long-term" (>90 days). However, the token's pump.fun origin suggests many top holders acquired early (launch-related), pointing to established positions rather than recent buys. | Item | Evidence Source | Confidence Level | |------|-----------------|------------------| | No selling detected | Solscan account pages (ranks 1-6) showing only old, small SOL txs | Medium (partial data; no token-specific outflows) | | Stable balances | Token overview and holder snapshots (e.g., rank 4 balance unchanged) | High (current snapshot consistent) | | Likely early holders | Pump.fun platform ties (from prior context, no conflicting data here) | Low (inferred from token type, not direct tx history) | ## Analysis of Available Information ### Confirmed Details The on-chain data from Solscan indicates minimal activity for sampled top holders—no sales or new accumulations are visible in the extracted records. For instance, rank 4's page lists transactions from 21 days ago, all involving tiny SOL amounts (<0.000005 SOL) via system programs, with no token transfers out. This pattern holds for other fetched pages, which are mostly static overviews without recent events. The token page itself confirms a fixed supply and holder list, but lacks dynamic history. Overall, this points to dormant top holders, which could mean long-term commitment rather than active trading or dumping. ### What's Missing To give you a complete picture, I'd need: - **Full transaction histories**: Detailed inflows/outflows for the top 10-25 addresses over 30-90 days, including acquisition dates and sale volumes—to count exact sellers (e.g., >10% balance reduction) and classify new (post-launch buys) vs. long-term holders. - **Timestamped balance changes**: First-hold dates for each wallet to quantify "relatively long time" (e.g., >60 days since token mint ~July 2024 based on pump.fun patterns). - **Token-specific filters**: The fetches include unrelated noise (e.g., SOL fees, other tokens like $PRINT), so broader on-chain queries excluding spam would clarify activity. These gaps prevent a precise count (e.g., "3/10 selling, 7 long-term")—current data only rules out recent visible sales but can't confirm holding durations or hidden activity. ## Recommendation **For deeper insight**, use Deep Research to gather: - Complete tx histories for top holder addresses via Solscan or similar explorers. - Wallet age and balance evolution data from on-chain analytics tools. - Pump.fun launch records to benchmark "early" vs. "new" holders. This will fill in the missing pieces and provide the comprehensive answer you're looking for. **Next step**: Start a new conversation and select **Deep Research** mode (ASK can't launch Deep Research directly from here).